| Name | Application | |
| 1 | Constant input | Developing the steady-state operating curve for the system |
| 2 | Step input | Finding the first-order plus dead-time (FOPDT) parameters |
| 3 | Sine input | Finding the Bode plot |
| 4 | Pulse input | Refining the FOPDT parameters |
| 5 | Custom input | Design your own input function. Ramp, sawtooth, triangle, for examples. |
| 6 | Proportional feedback | Verifying controller design. Determining region of stability, quarter decay, offset, etc. |
| 7 | Proportional-integral feedback | Verifying controller design. Determining region of stability, quarter decay, offset, etc. |
COURSE MANAGEMENT
In the Spring, 1996, semester, we offered a "Web"-based class. The equipment was available via the Web for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This class was managed by-in-large without "face-to-face" meetings. Laboratory information and assignments are provided on the Web server. The experiments, the analysis of the data, the controller design and the reporting were done at times chosen by the students. Discussion among students was available via a listserv. Students' reports were submitted via e-mail.
FACULTY WORKLOAD EQUIVALENT
The amount of work that went into putting this (existing) laboratory on the web was about half the amount of work of developing the lab originally from scratch. The previously prepared lab manual had to be significantly revised for applicability to the Web user. The communication software & equipment was continually presenting new learning opportunities. The Web "pages" took significant preparation time, largely due to the newness of the medium for the developer.
STRENGTHS AND OTHER ASPECTS
Sharing resources is one strong point of this ability to teach controls laboratory via the internet. The investment in equipment at UTC can be shared by other engineering schools. Previously, we have actively used the equipment for about 6 hours a week for about 20 weeks per year. This is a very small utilization fraction of the available hours in a year.
Providing learning opportunities for students with scheduling conflicts is another strong point of this ability to teach controls laboratory via the Web.
The main weaknesses experienced were equipment or communications bugs.
FUTURE
In keeping with the nature of the Web, the output provided to the Web user needs to be modified to provide graphical results, not just tabular data.
UTC is committed to continuing to develop and expand this Web-available laboratory. Extending the experiments to include unit operations labs is a possibility.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
UTC's Center of Excellence for Computer Applications has supported this effort with a generous grant. Other support has been received from the UTC College of Engineering and Computer Science, National Instruments, Plant Engineering Consultants, Apple Computer and Analog Devices.
REFERENCES
Henry, Jim, (1993), "Engineering Controls Systems with LabVIEW," Scientific and Engineering Applications for Macintosh, Woburn, MA, August, 1993. Available via Web at http://chem.engr.utc.edu/Henry-Pub
Henry, Jim, (1995), "LabVIEW Applications in Teaching Controls Systems Laboratories," ASEE Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, June, 1995. Available via Web at http://chem.engr.utc.edu/Henry-Pub
Henry, Jim, (1996) "Details of Web-based Controls Laboratory Hardware and Software," available via Web at http://chem.engr.utc.edu/Henry-Pub
Contact
Jim Henry
College of Engineering and Computer Science
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-425-4398
Fax: 423-425-5229
e-mail: Jim-Henry@utc.edu